<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &#38; Francis, LLP</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-05-08T08:03:00Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com" />
    <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.7798698045811032" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1204738/2018/08/cropped-site-identity-32x32.png</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[California Files Federal Lawsuit Seeking Info On Proposed Rollback Of Federal Clean Car Standards]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2019/04/california-files-federal-lawsuit-seeking-info-on-proposed-rollback-of-federal-clean-car-standards/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46154</id>
            <updated>2025-05-22T15:27:26Z</updated>
            <published>2019-04-02T14:43:18Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[california, climate change, greenhouse gases, lawsuit]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On April 5, 2019, California files a federal lawsuit seeking the underlying data and analyses behind the proposed rollback of the federal Clean Car Standards. The suit seeks to compel the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to produce requested background information. The suite contends that the NHTSA and the EPA failed to comply…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2019/04/california-files-federal-lawsuit-seeking-info-on-proposed-rollback-of-federal-clean-car-standards/"><![CDATA[On April 5, 2019, California files a federal lawsuit seeking the underlying data and analyses behind the proposed rollback of the federal Clean Car Standards. The suit seeks to compel the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to produce requested background information. The suite contends that the NHTSA and the EPA failed to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by the California Air Resources  board in early September 2018.

In the press release, Governor Gavin Newsom is reported stating “We must demand clean air for our kids, and our country must take immediate action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Yet, the Trump Administration is willfully withholding information on their ill-advised rollback of federal vehicle emission standards because there is simply no science or logic to back up their actions.”

The Trump Administration released its rollback proposal in August. In place of commonsense standards to increase vehicle fuel efficiency and reduce GHG emissions, as federal law requires, the proposal would freeze the standards at the 2020 level through the 2026 model year. The administration’s proposal would likely also block many other states that use California standards from moving forward. If California were required to follow the federal rollback proposal, global warming emissions could increase by almost 15 million metric tons per year by 2025. That is roughly equivalent to putting an additional 2.8 million cars on the state’s roads for a year. Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), a key smog-forming pollutant in the state, would increase to 430 tons in 2030.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[OEHHA Extends Public Comment Period for Proposed Cancer Inhalation Risk Factors for Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2019/03/oehha-extends-public-comment-period-for-proposed-cancer-inhalation-risk-factors-for-cobalt-and-cobalt-compounds/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46151</id>
            <updated>2025-05-22T15:26:56Z</updated>
            <published>2019-03-08T16:15:14Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[AB 2588, cobalt, health assessment, risk factors]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[OEHHA has extended the public comment period for the inhalation unit risk (IUR) factors for cobalt and cobalt compounds to May 7, 2019. OEHHA released the draft document Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds Cancer IUR Factors for public review on March 8, 2019. The public period was scheduled to close on April 22, 2019.  However, OEHHA received a request from ToxStrategies,…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2019/03/oehha-extends-public-comment-period-for-proposed-cancer-inhalation-risk-factors-for-cobalt-and-cobalt-compounds/"><![CDATA[OEHHA has extended the public comment period for the inhalation unit risk (IUR) factors for cobalt and cobalt compounds to May 7, 2019. OEHHA released the draft document Cobalt and Cobalt Compounds Cancer IUR Factors for public review on March 8, 2019. The public period was scheduled to close on April 22, 2019.  However, OEHHA received a request from ToxStrategies, Inc., to extend the period and it has done so.

OEHHA is required to develop guidelines for conducting risk assessment under the AB 2588 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program. The cobalt and cobalt compounds cancer IUR factors were developed using the most recent Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Technical Support Document for Cancer Potency Factors finalized by OEHHA in 2009.

Link to the download draft document:  https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/cobaltiurdraft030819.pdf]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[It is Prudent to Involve Counsel at the Outset When Selling a Potentially Contaminated Property,]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2017/05/it-is-prudent-to-involve-counsel-at-the-outset-when-selling-a-potentially-contaminated-property/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46097</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:42:21Z</updated>
            <published>2017-05-12T15:56:46Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In most commercial real estate transactions, the buyer and/or lender require a Phase I environmental site assessment (“ESA”). Hopefully, the ESA does not identify any recognized environmental conditions (“REC”), and the transaction closes. However, if RECs are identified, it is not uncommon for the buyer to request a Phase II invasive investigation to verify the existence or non-existence of the…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2017/05/it-is-prudent-to-involve-counsel-at-the-outset-when-selling-a-potentially-contaminated-property/"><![CDATA[In most commercial real estate transactions, the buyer and/or lender require a Phase I environmental site assessment (“ESA”). Hopefully, the ESA does not identify any recognized environmental conditions (“REC”), and the transaction closes. However, if RECs are identified, it is not uncommon for the buyer to request a Phase II invasive investigation to verify the existence or non-existence of the REC. At this stage, it may be wise for the seller to obtain the advice of counsel. Instead, all too often, the seller promptly agrees to the request for several reasons. An inexperienced broker may be advising the seller that the Phase II is simple and non-intrusive, and he may be correct in describing the Phase II in that manner. The cost may be minimal when compared to the transaction price; indeed, the buyer may even volunteer to pay for some or all of the Phase II. It is difficult to find a reason not to authorize such work at that stage when one is close to the finish line of closing the deal. In fact, if the lender is requesting the work, then the thinking is that the deal most certainly will not close without the additional Phase II, so it is no-brainer to authorize the work.

However, a prudent seller should exercise caution at this point. If the Phase II does turn up significant impacts, then not only is the deal as structured off the table, but reporting obligations may also have been triggered. At that point, the seller holds an unmarketable property and now also faces further investigation and remediation costs and possibly an enforcement action if he or she fails to conduct such work. Depending upon the issue, these costs could exceed the original transaction price.

Of course, no one can advise the owner/seller beforehand of what the Phase II will turn up, but a seller should still conduct its own due diligence and protect its interests at this stage of the transaction. The buyer, broker, and environmental consultant may all have an interest in seeing the Phase II work conducted because there is no ultimate downside to them if the results are negative. Thus, the seller may want a “second opinion” on the Phase I from an independent consultant who can provide an unbiased view of the risks associated with a Phase II. Counsel could be retained to advise and potentially maintain these opinions as privileged and confidential. Counsel with a technical background that is also familiar with regulatory agency requirements would be especially beneficial in terms of advising of the potential risks of additional work. In fact, counsel can also provide helpful input from the outset. For example, a related issue is whether, the initial Phase I consultant should be instructed only to identify RECs and refrain from including its own recommendations for additional testing in the ESA report. It is one thing to identify REC’s, but if the ESA expressly recommends additional Phase II work, then the deal likely falters unless that Phase II work is conducted.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Plans Are in the Air]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2016/03/plans-are-in-the-air/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46103</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:15:13Z</updated>
            <published>2016-03-25T05:56:58Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[air, air quality, aqmd, aqmp, carb, environmental, epa, ozone]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[At roughly three-year intervals, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopts a regional Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) to address public health standards for ozone and particulate matter, The AQMP coordinates the efforts of many agencies, including the CA Air Resources Board (CARB) and the US EPA. With the 2016 AQMP, the SCAQMD is considering drastic reductions in…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2016/03/plans-are-in-the-air/"><![CDATA[At roughly three-year intervals, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopts a regional Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) to address public health standards for ozone and particulate matter, The AQMP coordinates the efforts of many agencies, including the CA Air Resources Board (CARB) and the US EPA. With the 2016 AQMP, the SCAQMD is considering drastic reductions in allowable levels of ozone. The goal is to achieve a 50% reduction in oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions by 2023 and additional reduction of 15% beyond 2023 levels by 2031.

The SCAQMD will attempt to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for 8-Hour Ozone (75 parts per billion) by 2032, and for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) (12 micrograms per cubic meter) by 2021-2025. The 8-hour Ozone NAAQS is based on the number of days per year with a 8-hour average concentration of 75 ppb or greater. The NAAQS for PM2.5 defines the maximum amount of airborne particles up to 2.5 microns in size that can be present in outdoor air without threatening the public’s health. Most significantly, the AQMP will be considering an even stricter proposed federal 8-Hour Ozone Standard in the 65-70 parts per billion range, which would mandate much higher emission reductions than in the past.

In order to achieve such reductions, the plan introduces the following policy objectives:

- eliminate reliance on currently unknown “black box” future technologies by providing pathways to attain reduction with existing specific control measures

- calculate co-benefits from other planning efforts

- develop strategy with fair-share emission reductions at all levels of regulation, such as federal engine emission standards and state mobile source standards

- seek funding to incentivize early deployment of non-polluting technologies

- enhance socioeconomic analysis to select the most efficient cost-effective paths to meet pollutant reduction targets

- prioritize non-regulatory and innovative approaches for emissions reductions.

There will be extensive public input into the 2016 AQMP. The AQMP Advisory Group, consisting of business, academic and government groups, will be conducting open meetings through the first part of 2016. Public comments are welcome, and public workshops, hearings and outreach will be scheduled in the near future. The Plan is due to be considered by the SCAQMD Board in April 2016, and if approved, will be submitted to the US EPA for approval in July 2016.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[New York Times Article Features Current Firm Project]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2016/02/new-york-times-article-features-current-firm-project/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46102</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:16:22Z</updated>
            <published>2016-02-25T06:56:55Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[brownfield, brownfields, environmental, law]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer & Francis, LLP represents the investor property owner in connection with the Garden Grove site discussed in the New York Times article, Turning Polluted Properties Into Profits.]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2016/02/new-york-times-article-features-current-firm-project/"><![CDATA[Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP represents the investor property owner in connection with the Garden Grove site discussed in the New York Times article, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/27/your-money/turning-polluted-properties-into-profits.html?_r=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external">Turning Polluted Properties Into Profits</a>.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[AB2: A New Development in Redevelopment]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2016/01/ab2-a-new-development-in-redevelopment/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46089</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:44:48Z</updated>
            <published>2016-01-25T06:56:31Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[ab2, environmental, government, housing, polanco, redevelopment, revitalization]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A new law has given cities, counties and special districts an effective conduit of redevelopment funding to take the place of their departed redevelopment agencies. Effective January 1, 2016, Assembly Bill 2 (AB2), also known as the Community Redevelopment Law (California Govt. Code 62000 et seq.), allows a local agency to create a “Community Revitalization Authority” in economically depressed areas,…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2016/01/ab2-a-new-development-in-redevelopment/"><![CDATA[A new law has given cities, counties and special districts an effective conduit of redevelopment funding to take the place of their departed redevelopment agencies. Effective January 1, 2016, Assembly Bill 2 (AB2), also known as the Community Redevelopment Law (California Govt. Code 62000 et seq.), allows a local agency to create a “Community Revitalization Authority” in economically depressed areas, i.e. those areas where more than 80% of the residents have household incomes below the California median, and/or those areas with high unemployment and crime rates and deteriorating infrastructure and buildings. The Authority would then be required to adopt a community revitalization and investment plan for each community revitalization and investment area. These Community Revitalization Authorities will have the power to fund affordable housing, brownfields cleanup, and infrastructure construction and repair. They will also be given the power to purchase property or acquire it by eminent domain and to provide direct assistance to local manufacturing and industrial businesses. This funding will be generated by issuance of bonds serviced by tax revenues. In order to safeguard against the secrecy and dubious spending priorities that led to the demise of the redevelopment agencies, AB2 requires each Authority to set aside 25% of its tax revenue to be deposited in an affordable housing fund, which fund must be used only to create and improve low and moderate-income housing. AB2 also requires the Authorities to be subject to periodic state audits, and prohibits them from taking tax revenues away from school districts without consent.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &#038; Francis LLP Moves to 915 Wilshire]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2015/12/demetriou-del-guercio-springer-francis-llp-moves-to-915-wilshire/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46155</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T12:43:10Z</updated>
            <published>2015-12-15T09:43:21Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Effective December 21, 2015, Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer & Francis LLP is pleased to announce that its Los Angeles offices have moved three blocks to 915 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 90017-3496.  All other contact information remains the same.]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2015/12/demetriou-del-guercio-springer-francis-llp-moves-to-915-wilshire/"><![CDATA[Effective December 21, 2015, Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis LLP is pleased to announce that its Los Angeles offices have moved three blocks to 915 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 90017-3496.  All other contact information remains the same.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[California Supreme Court Overrules Henkel and Holds Insurer Consent Is Not Required For Assignment]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2015/08/california-supreme-court-overrules-henkel-and-holds-insurer-consent-is-not-required-for-assignment/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46091</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:47:34Z</updated>
            <published>2015-08-25T05:56:37Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In Fluor v. Superior Court (August 20, 2015) 61 Cal.4th 1175, the California Supreme Court overruled its prior decision in Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 29 Cal. 4th 934 (2003) and found policyholders could assign rights to insurance coverage without obtaining insurer consent.  This returned California to the position held by most other jurisdictions in the nation. …]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2015/08/california-supreme-court-overrules-henkel-and-holds-insurer-consent-is-not-required-for-assignment/"><![CDATA[In <em>Fluor v. Superior Court</em> (August 20, 2015) 61 Cal.4th 1175, the California Supreme Court overruled its prior decision in <em>Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident &amp; Indemnity Co.</em>, 29 Cal. 4th 934 (2003) and found policyholders could assign rights to insurance coverage without obtaining insurer consent.  This returned California to the position held by most other jurisdictions in the nation.  The holding addressed consent to assignment provisions in insurance policies and whether or not an insurer must provide consent for such an assignment to be effective.  The issue often arises in connection with long tail liabilities coupled with corporate reorganizations or transfers.  For example, if Company A is potentially responsible for a historic release of contamination in the 1970’s, it could face a present day claim.  If Company A still exists in its present format as it did as a named insured under the historic policy, it can tender the claim for coverage under that historic policy.  However, if Company A reorganized and/or transferred assets/liabilities into a new business entity, then its present iteration could face obstacles obtaining coverage.  In <em>Henkel</em>, after a series of agreements, plaintiff Henkel Corporation (Henkel) acquired the metallic chemical product line of Amchem Products, Inc. (Amchem No. 1) and assumed all related liabilities. However, the California Supreme Court would not allow that Henkel also acquired the benefits of the insurance policies issued to Amchem No. 1.  In <em>Fluor</em>, a subsequent reverse spinoff company of the historic insured was able to obtain coverage after the California Supreme Court overruled <em>Henkel</em> and held that an insurer must honor an insured’s assignment of the right to invoke defense or indemnification coverage for an injury that occurred within the time limits of a policy.  The <em>Fluor</em> Court justified its new position by claiming it was based upon Insurance Code section 520—a statute tracing back to 1872, which was not cited to or considered in <em>Henkel</em>.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Putting the Development Back Into Redevelopment]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2014/01/putting-the-development-back-into-redevelopment/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46090</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:55:01Z</updated>
            <published>2014-01-25T06:56:34Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[brownfield, brownfields, ddsf, development, environmental, gatto, law, polanco]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The demise of the “redevelopment agency” in California in 2012 was swift and sudden.  In the midst of a budget crisis, the California legislature dissolved the hundreds of redevelopment agencies across the state, and used their tax proceeds to balance the state budget.  A consequence of this action was the disarming of the Polanco Act, which redevelopment agencies had used…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2014/01/putting-the-development-back-into-redevelopment/"><![CDATA[The demise of the “redevelopment agency” in California in 2012 was swift and sudden.  In the midst of a budget crisis, the California legislature dissolved the hundreds of redevelopment agencies across the state, and used their tax proceeds to balance the state budget.  A consequence of this action was the disarming of the Polanco Act, which redevelopment agencies had used to compel responsible parties to clean up environmentally contaminated “brownfields” sites.  The Polanco Act had aided in redevelopment of these sites by granting immunity for hazardous substance releases to redevelopment agencies, redevelopers and lenders once the approved cleanup plan was implemented.  Without the power of the Polanco Act, these entities were hesitant to take on the responsibility of redeeming brownfields sites, leading to their abandonment and resulting in area blight.

In order to resurrect the benefits of the Polanco Act, the Legislature recently passed AB 440, the “Gatto Act” (CA Health &amp; Safety Code Section 24503 et seq.) which allows cities, counties and housing authorities to exercise most of the same powers and immunities that were formerly granted by the Polanco Act, along with some new enhancements to the old law.

Importantly, the Gatto Act now allows agencies to use their redevelopment powers on blighted areas “anywhere within their jurisdiction” not just within designated redevelopment project areas.  The Gatto Act definition of blighted property is one “with the presence or perceived presence of a release or releases of hazardous material that contributes to the vacancies, abandonment of property, or reduction or lack of property utilization of property”  This definition is in line with the federal EPA definition of “brownfields” as “real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant”.

The local agency must submit advanced notice to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), prior to taking any action.  As in the Polanco Act, 60 days’ notice is given to the responsible party of the order to prepare a cleanup and investigation plan.  However, the Gatto Act gives the responsible party 30 days within which to appeal the notice with a hearing before the local agency, with said appeal staying the 60 day notice.

A further significant obstacle to agency action to cleanup brownfields has been eliminated by the Gatto Act, which now allows agencies to access a property to conduct an initial site assessment and investigation, without having to resort to eminent domain, as was the case under the Polanco Act.

If local and state agencies have conflicting interests in overseeing the cleanup, the Gatto Act allows for a dispute resolution. If the agencies cannot agree, it will be submitted to a site designation committee to designate the agency in charge, including representatives from the DTSC and RWQCB (if they are not themselves involved).

Enhanced public participation is also mandated by the Gatto Act, as notice of the cleanup plan must be posted at the site and in local papers, public comments can be solicited, and public meetings would be held by request.

Although the loss of the redevelopment agency in California was a significant setback in the fight to remediate blight and develop brownfields properties, the Gatto Act has given local agencies the powers and immunities once granted to the redevelopment agencies by the Polanco Act, along with new and improved tools to provide agencies, developers and lenders the security and incentive for productive development of formerly distressed sites.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Brian D. Langa Identified as 2013 Southern California Rising Star]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2013/11/brian-d-langa-identified-as-2013-southern-california-rising-star-2/" />
            <id>https://www.ddsffirm.com/?p=46105</id>
            <updated>2020-03-02T13:13:30Z</updated>
            <published>2013-11-27T06:57:05Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[environmental, law]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[For the sixth year in a row, Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer & Francis, LLP’s Brian D. Langa has been identified by Super Lawyers magazine as a Rising Star. Mr. Langa has been identified as a rising star in the field of environmental law each and every year since his initial eligibility for the honor in 2006.  Super Lawyers selects attorneys…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.ddsffirm.com/blog/2013/11/brian-d-langa-identified-as-2013-southern-california-rising-star-2/"><![CDATA[<a href="/wp-content/uploads/sites/1204738/2019/11/4125-web.jpg" data-wpel-link="internal"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1089" title="4125 - web" src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/1204738/2019/11/4125-web-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>For the sixth year in a row, Demetriou, Del Guercio, Springer &amp; Francis, LLP’s Brian D. Langa has been identified by Super Lawyers magazine as a Rising Star.

Mr. Langa has been identified as a rising star in the field of environmental law each and every year since his initial eligibility for the honor in 2006<img title="More..." src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/1204738/2019/11/trans.gif" alt="" />.  Super Lawyers selects attorneys to its Rising Stars list using a rigorous, multiphase rating process, and no more than 2.5% of lawyers in California are named to the Rising Stars list.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>